Clarity Grading Scales

Brief overview of the different scales used by different organizations

In the fascinating world of gemstones, clarity is a key factor in assessing a gemstone’s quality and value. Various organizations use different scales to grade clarity, each with its unique criteria and classifications. Here’s a brief overview of the clarity grading scales used by some of the leading gemological organizations, perfect for those seeking to understand the nuances of gemstone clarity:

1. GIA (Gemological Institute of America): The GIA’s clarity grading system is perhaps the most widely recognized and is primarily used for diamonds. It ranges from ‘Flawless’ (no inclusions or blemishes visible under 10x magnification) to ‘Included’ (inclusions and/or blemishes visible to the naked eye). The scale includes grades like VVS (Very, Very Slightly Included), VS (Very Slightly Included), SI (Slightly Included), and I (Included).
2. AGS (American Gem Society): The AGS uses a numerical system for clarity grading, ranging from 0 (Flawless) to 10 (Heavily Included). This scale parallels the GIA’s system but is expressed in numbers rather than descriptive terms. It’s known for its precision and is often used in tandem with the GIA scale for diamonds.
3. EGL (European Gemological Laboratory): The EGL clarity scale is similar to the GIA scale but includes additional categories. For instance, it separates the ‘SI’ category into SI1 and SI2 and likewise for the ‘I’ category, offering a more nuanced understanding of the inclusions.
4. IGI (International Gemological Institute): The IGI’s clarity grading system is also similar to GIA’s, but it’s often used for colored gemstones as well as diamonds. IGI reports provide detailed descriptions of the type, location, and size of inclusions.
5. CIBJO (The World Jewellery Confederation): CIBJO uses a system that closely resembles the GIA scale, but it is more often applied to colored gemstones. CIBJO’s guidelines offer detailed descriptions and drawings to illustrate different types of inclusions.
6. Colored Gemstone Clarity Scales: For colored gemstones, clarity grading is less standardized than diamonds. Many organizations use a modified version of the GIA scale, but the emphasis is often on the gemstone’s overall appearance rather than strictly on its inclusions. Terms like ‘Eye Clean’ (no visible inclusions to the naked eye) are commonly used.

Each of these scales offers a different perspective on gemstone clarity, reflecting the diverse needs and preferences of gem enthusiasts and professionals. Understanding these various scales can greatly enhance a buyer’s or collector’s ability to make informed decisions and appreciate the unique beauty and characteristics of each gemstone. Whether for diamonds or colored stones, clarity grading is an essential aspect of gemology, providing a crucial insight into a gemstone’s quality and rarity.

Comparison between scales

When comparing the clarity grading scales used by different gemological organizations, it’s important to understand how these scales align and differ from each other. The Gemological Institute of America (GIA) and the American Gem Society (AGS) are most commonly referenced, but other organizations like the European Gemological Laboratory (EGL), International Gemological Institute (IGI), and CIBJO also have their unique scales. Here’s a comparison to give you a clearer picture:

• GIA vs. AGS:
  • Similarities: Both GIA and AGS grading scales assess the size, nature, position, and quantity of inclusions and blemishes in a gemstone. Their criteria for grading clarity are fundamentally similar.
  • Differences: The main difference lies in their representation. GIA uses descriptive terms (like VVS, VS, SI, and I), while AGS uses a numerical scale from 0 to 10, with 0 being equivalent to GIA’s ‘Flawless’ and 10 to GIA’s ‘I’ category. The AGS scale provides a more granular and precise clarity grade.
• GIA vs. EGL:
  • Similarities: Both use a similar descriptive scale from ‘Flawless’ to ‘Included’.
  • Differences: EGL often includes additional subcategories within each main category, providing a more nuanced classification. However, it’s generally perceived that EGL’s standards are somewhat more lenient compared to GIA, particularly at lower clarity grades.
• GIA vs. IGI:
  • Similarities: IGI’s clarity grading system is akin to GIA’s, with similar categories from ‘Flawless’ to ‘Included’.
  • Differences: IGI is often used for both diamonds and colored gemstones, and its reports may include more detailed descriptions of the inclusions.
• GIA vs. CIBJO:
  • Similarities: CIBJO’s scale is closely aligned with GIA’s, especially in terms of the terminology used for clarity grades.
  • Differences: CIBJO provides more comprehensive guidelines and visual representations, which is particularly useful for colored gemstones.
• Colored Gemstones:
  • Overall Comparison: For colored gemstones, clarity grading is less standardized and more subjective compared to diamonds. The emphasis is often on the gemstone’s overall appearance rather than a strict count of inclusions.
  • Differences: Terms like ‘Eye Clean’ are common, and the grading can vary more significantly between different organizations or even individual graders.

It’s crucial for consumers and professionals alike to understand these differences and similarities. While the fundamental principles of clarity grading are consistent, the representation and slight variations in standards can lead to different clarity grades for the same gemstone by different organizations.

Awareness of these nuances is key when comparing gemstones, particularly for high-value purchases or for collectors who seek specific quality standards.

Visit the link for more details about clarity!